Legal Opinion

Freshwater v. Scheidt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1999No. 97-1502PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The central issue in this case concerns the extent to which statements from learned treatises and other publications may be used to impeach the testimony of expert witnesses. Prior to the promulgation of Evid.R. 706,2 effective July 1, 1998, rules governing the use of learned treatises evolved under the common law. In Hallworth v. Republic Steel Corp. (1950), 153 Ohio St. 349, 41 O.O. 341, 91 N.E.2d 690, paragraph two of the syllabus, the court held that learned treatises, even though properly identified, authenticated, and recognized as standard authority, are not admissible in evidence to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stinson v. EnglandOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hallworth v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Jacober v. St. Peter's Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. Lambert v. DallyOhio Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SamatarOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Limle v. Laboratory Corporation of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. DepewOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Sutton v. ScheidtOhio Court of Appeals · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API