Legal Opinion

State v. Depew

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1999No. Case No. 98CA2469PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kline, Presiding Judge.

Joshua Q. DePew appeals the Ross County Court of Common Pleas’ judgment finding him guilty of involuntary manslaughter. DePew asserts that the trial court prejudicially denied his constitutional right to cross-examine the state’s medical expert when it barred him from using learned treatises to impeach the expert. Based upon the interpretation of Evid.R. 706 articulated by the Supreme Court of Ohio in Freshwater v. Scheidt (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 260, 714 N.E.2d 891, we agree. DePew also asserts that the trial court erred by denying his request for a mistrial based upon…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ohio v. HymoreOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Rigby v. Lake CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Stinson v. EnglandOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Freshwater v. ScheidtOhio Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ravenscraft v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. Stewart v. VivianOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Gysegem v. Ohio State Univ. Wexner Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. AdbulehOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API