Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Dally

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1972No. 784PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

This is an action in bastardy. After the jury verdict finding the defendant to be the father of the child involved, a motion for new trial was filed by the defendant. This was granted by the trial judge who gave three reasons for his action.

1. The court erred in failing to grant defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence.

2. The court erred in failing to rule on defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

3. The verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

From this order directing a new trial in the action, the appellant has appealed to this court. Although…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hallworth v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hinkle v. Cleveland Clinic FoundationOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Serv., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Freshwater v. ScheidtOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API