Legal Opinion
Sydney N. Floersheim, an Individual Trading and Doing Business as Floersheim Sales Company and National Research Company v. Lewis A. Engman
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 26, 1973No. 72-1622PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:
Appellant sells to creditors and debt-collection agencies certain forms used to trace allegedly delinquent debtors (“skip-tracer forms”) and to induce them to pay their debts (“payment demand” forms). The Federal Trade Commission’s order of February 5, 1968, required appellant (1) to cease and desist from certain deceptive and misleading practices with respect to the appearance and content of these forms and (2) to file a report of compliance as required by 16 C.F.R. § 3.61. The order was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Floersheim v. FTC, 411…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Potomac Electric Power Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. EngmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Price v. ZONING BD. OF APP. OF HONOLULUHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Ford Motor Company v. ColemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Smith v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.