Legal Opinion
Smith v. Federal Trade Commission
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 30, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-15, 75-45 to 75-50, 75-56, 75-412, 75-415, 76-17 to 76-26, 76-36, 76-39, 76-56 and 76-60PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Presently before the Court is a series of motions in a complex administrative law case 1 involving pre-enforcement challenges to two Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”) programs, the Line of Business Program (“LB Program”) and Corporate Pattern Reports (“CPR”). At issue are plaintiffs’ 2 motions for a preliminary injunction and summary judgment, 3 the Commission’s cross-motion for summary judgment, 4 -its motion to dismiss, stay or transfer and plaintiffs’ motion to stay consideration of the Commission’s motion to dismiss,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware River Port Authority v. Transamerican Trailer Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hemmings v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
- Deering Milliken, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Amoco Production Co. v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1979
- Downstate Stone Company, an Illinois Corporation v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- In Re FTC Corporate Patterns Report LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.