Legal Opinion
Hinds v. Mulvaney
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 20, 2018No. Case No. 1:17–cv–00023 (TNM)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TREVOR N. MCFADDEN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Janice Hinds, who is proceeding pro se, alleges that her employer, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,1 discriminated against her on the basis of race and sex on seven occasions and retaliated against her for opposing Title VII violations on 14 occasions. Her complaint seeks $20 million in punitive damages, $300,000 in compensatory damages, $300,000 in interest, a pay raise, and any reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. Her case comes before me on the Defendant's motion to dismiss in part and for summary judgment. Because there…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wilkerson v. GruenbergCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- George v. Office of Chief Technology OfficerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Hockaday v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Liu v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Moini v. WrightonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.