Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Perlmutter

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 9, 1935PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

Two main questions of testamentary interpretation are submitted for determination in this proceeding, and, dependent upon the decision of one of these, there is potentially presented the question of the effect of an agreement purporting to dispose of portions of the estate in a manner differing from that provided in the will.

The testamentary document in question, which was drawn by an attorney, was dated on June 7, 1932, approximately seven months *573prior to testator’s death. The net estate as reflected by the account totals about $110,000 prior to deduction of commissions.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re HornidgeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  2. Parsell v. . StrykerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. In re the Estate of SoyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  4. In re the Estate of CorliesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  5. Otis v. . ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Black v. GettysSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. MacGregor v. RouxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Helitzer v. HelitzerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Matter of Daben Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1979
  5. In re the Estate of BeckmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API