Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Beckmann

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 10, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

Whereas the instant will was executed in 1921, its direction which is the subject of present controversy would seem indicative of the possession by the testator of prophetic vision in forseeing the vicissitudes which have followed the financial debacle of 1929. The questioned provision reads:

“ Fifth. All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, both real and personal, of which I may die seized or possessed, I give, devise and bequeath to my executors hereinafter named, or any successors that may be appointed, to take possession of and I hereby order and direct such executors,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Robert v. . CorningNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Fulton Trust Co. v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Nelson v. . RussellNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts McAlpineNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Dougherty v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HilliardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re the Estate of QuigleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  3. In re the Estate of WilliamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  4. In re the Estate of GreenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  5. In re the Construction of the Will of BehnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API