Legal Opinion
Helitzer v. Helitzer
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 23, 1985No. Nos. 83-1055, 83-1120PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
The appeals in this diversity action arose out of a contract made between two brothers with respect to their mother’s property, which they believed they would take by will or by survivorship arrangements when their mother died. At the time of the agreement their mother, Lena Helitzer, lived in Florida; one of the brothers, Melvin Helitzer, lived in New York; the other, Bernard Helitzer, lived in Kansas. They were Lena’s only children, were the beneficiaries under her then current will, and were on most, but apparently not all, of her “Totten” trust1 bank accounts. At the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anderson v. Century Products Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. NeitzelDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Babich v. Unisys Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Christoffersen v. Washington State Air National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Christoffersen v. Washington State Air National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.