Legal Opinion

Wilson v. McKee and McDanel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1933No. Appeal 48PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

This was an action in assumpsit by a duly licensed broker to recover commissions alleged to have been earned in producing a buyer for real estate, who was ready and willing to purchase, but with whom the owner refused to deal.

The appellants, who were partners, owned, as such, jointly, a piece of real estate in Ambridge, known as the Post Office Building. They contemplated dissolving the partnership and requested A. W. Wilson, of the firm of Wilson & Davis, — the use plaintiff, to whom we shall hereafter refer as the plaintiff, — to secure a purchaser for this building for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trainer v. FortSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Foster's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  3. Shupe v. RaineySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MacY v. OSWALD Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Macy v. OswaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. McCormick v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. W. Hagenlocher & Co. v. WalkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Wasatch Const. Co. v. Utah Const. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API