Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wasatch Const. Co. v. Utah Const. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1938No. 5899Published

1DissentWolfe, Justice

I concur in the conclusion that the content of understanding between the parties must be gleaned not only from their initial conversations, but also from the evolution of the de velopments on the various jobs. The actual work necessitated modifications and changes in detail which were not foreseeable in the original negotiations. The parties agree that the original idea was that the plaintiff should furnish forty per cent of the equipment and defendant sixty per cent, but that in actual practice it could not work with exactitude. The real issue pertains to the question of formula for the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. National Union Indemnity Co. v. Bruce Bros.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Korbly v. Springfield Institution for SavingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Anspacher v. Utterback's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Boreing v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API