Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Dominguez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 2017No. C120210DRD; A159621PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, J.

Mother appeals a supplemental judgment changing custody of the parties’ two children from mother to father. On appeal, mother asserts that the court erred in denying her request for additional time to present her case.1 On review for abuse of discretion, Daves v. Kohan, 282 Or App 243, 244, 385 P3d 1161 (2016), rev den, 361 Or 439 (2017), we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying mother’s request for additional time, because the court did not prevent her from making a reasonably complete presentation of evidence and argument. Accordingly, we affirm.

We start with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of OrtizOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Fulton v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. In re the Marriage of Howell-HooymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Daves v. KohanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Decker v. KlapatchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Douglas and MinzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Douglas and MinzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API