Legal Opinion

Viracola v. Dallas International Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1974No. 5315PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice.

The defendant, L. A. Viracola, appeals from a summary judgment awarding the plaintiff, Dallas International Bank, recovery against him on a past due note. American Panel Corporation and Viracola are co-makers of the note and Bank is its payee. Viracola signed the note as president of the corporation and in his individual capacity. It was executed on April 7, 1970, and was due 90 days thereafter. This suit was brought against Viracola only. We reverse and remand.

To be entitled to a summary judgment in a proceeding such as this, a plaintiff must come forward with proper pleadings…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Womack v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ford v. CulbertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hunter, Evans & Co. v. LaniusTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Harrington v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Town North National Bank v. BroaddusTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Clark v. Dedina, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  3. Martin v. WinfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Sawyer v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Wise v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API