Legal Opinion
Midwest of Cannon Falls, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 14, 1997No. 96-1271, 96-1279PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
The United States (the government) appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding that the Customs Service (Customs) incorrectly classified 25 of the 29 imported items. Midwest of Cannon Falls, Inc. (Midwest) cross-appeals on the classification of two of the four items on which the trial court ruled in favor of the government. We hold in favor of Midwest, affirming the trial court’s judgment with respect to the 25 items appealed by the United States and reversing with respect to the two items cross-appealed by Midwest.
I
Midwest…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Marubeni America Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Totes, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Atlas Copco North America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Avenues in Leather, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Park B. Smith, Ltd., Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Rubie's Costume Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Alcan Aluminum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.