State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Boyer
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from a decision adverse to it in a declaratory judgment action. We affirm.
State Farm initiated the action praying that the trial court would determine that no insurance coverage was afforded the insured, William E. Boyer, under a policy of insurance previously issued to Boyer by State Farm. The policy contained the following clause:
USE OF NON-OWNED AUTOMOBILES
If the named insured is a person or persons, and if during the policy period such named insured owns a motor vehicle covered by this policy and classified as `pleasure and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Alabama Power Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Housing Authority v. Decatur Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Blount Brothers Construction Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Hamilton v. BrowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jim Short Ford Sales, Inc. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Hill v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- State Auto Mutual Insurance v. McIntyre Ex Rel. BuckDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1987
- Hickox v. Vester Morgan, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Southern Ry. Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.