Legal Opinion

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Boyer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1978PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from a decision adverse to it in a declaratory judgment action. We affirm.

State Farm initiated the action praying that the trial court would determine that no insurance coverage was afforded the insured, William E. Boyer, under a policy of insurance previously issued to Boyer by State Farm. The policy contained the following clause:

USE OF NON-OWNED AUTOMOBILES

If the named insured is a person or persons, and if during the policy period such named insured owns a motor vehicle covered by this policy and classified as `pleasure and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Jones v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Housing Authority v. Decatur Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Blount Brothers Construction Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Hamilton v. BrowningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jim Short Ford Sales, Inc. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Hill v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. State Auto Mutual Insurance v. McIntyre Ex Rel. BuckDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1987
  4. Hickox v. Vester Morgan, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API