Julius L. Worthy v. United States

STEADMAN, Senior Judge:

Appellant Julius L. Worthy, convicted at a bench trial of assault and attempted threats,1 challenges the introduction of a prior consistent statement made by the victim relating to threats made by appellant. We conclude that under the eircum-stances of this case, the prior consistent statement was properly admitted into evidence.

Facts

This case arose out of a family quarrel between Worthy and his older sister, Alex-sandra Green, shortly after midnight on January 8, 2012. Green testified that after Worthy said that he was “going to whoop [her] butt,” she ran from the…