Legal Opinion

Scott v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1980No. 12104, 12205 and 12265PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YEAGLEY, Associate Judge,

Retired:

Appellants were found guilty by a jury of statutory rape under D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2801 1 and brought this appeal. Finding error in the record, we reverse.

At the time of the crime the complainant, herein referred to as A. J., was 13 years old. The day before the crime, her parents had forbidden her to see her boyfriend, Michael, then 15 years old. Nevertheless, on April 2, 1976, A. J. went to Michael’s house after school and initiated sexual intercourse with him. A. J. requested him to let her stay overnight, but he told her she could not and began walking her…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Theodore D. MorlangCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Beale v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Warren v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Williamson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Logan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Carpenter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API