Legal Opinion

In re C.A.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2018No. 16-FS-632PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Easterly, Associate Judge:

*121 Appellant C.A. appeals from a determination that he was "involved" in two counts of attempted first degree murder while armed and related lesser charges. He argues both that the trial court should not have precluded his impeachment of a key government witness and that it should not have admitted a prior consistent statement by that same witness. We review the trial court's evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion, recognizing that it is necessarily such an abuse for the trial court to employ "incorrect legal standards." Mayhand v. United States , 127 A.3d 1198 ,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. James P. McNeillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Andre Holmon v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. In re Estate of Martin; McCrayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Johnson II v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. Sims v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API