Legal Opinion

Baird v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railroad

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 17, 1963PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The court is urged to reverse its position that a wife may not maintain an action to recover damages for loss or impairment of her husband’s consortium caused by negligence of another party.

The particular case is a suit filed by Mrs. Martha Lillian Baird against the Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co., charging that by the defendant’s negligence in operating its train at a public crossing, the plaintiff’s husband, Harrison Baird, was “totally incapacitated from working and was permanently injured and placed in extreme financial difficulties” ; that by reason thereof she,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Novak v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Bernhardt v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  5. Leland K. Aubrey and Charlotte R. Aubrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Kotsiris v. LingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  5. Hoffman v. DautelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API