Baird v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railroad
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
STANLEY, Commissioner.
The court is urged to reverse its position that a wife may not maintain an action to recover damages for loss or impairment of her husband’s consortium caused by negligence of another party.
The particular case is a suit filed by Mrs. Martha Lillian Baird against the Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co., charging that by the defendant’s negligence in operating its train at a public crossing, the plaintiff’s husband, Harrison Baird, was “totally incapacitated from working and was permanently injured and placed in extreme financial difficulties” ; that by reason thereof she,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Novak v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Bernhardt v. PerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- Leland K. Aubrey and Charlotte R. Aubrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Deems v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Kotsiris v. LingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Hoffman v. DautelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.