Legal Opinion

Novak v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 11, 1963No. 49233PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COIL, Commissioner.

Rita Novak’s petition averred that her husband, while a passenger in an automobile, was negligently injured by respondent and as a result she had been deprived of his consortium, including his companionship and conjugal affection, for which she sought $100,000 as damages.

Respondent’s motion for summary judgment was sustained on the ground that a wife may not recover for loss of consortium caused by the negligence of a third party, and Mrs. Novak has appealed.

Under the early common law, although a husband was permitted to recover for an impairment or loss of the consortium…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  3. Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Acuff v. SchmitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Hoekstra v. HelgelandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. American Export Lines, Inc. v. AlvezSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. Gates v. FoleySupreme Court of Florida · 1971

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API