Legal Opinion

Frey v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1913No. Civ. No. 1381PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPLICATION for Writ of Prohibition directed to the Superior Court of San Diego County and W. A. Sloane, Judge thereof. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

In prohibition. The facts presented by the affidavit and petition are these: Frey, the petitioner, as owner, contracted with one Campbell for the construction of a building. The same was completed and thereafter an action was begun to foreclose mechanics’ liens, to which Frey, the contractor and lien claimants, other than the plaintiffs, were made parties. Among the lien claimants was a corporation known as The Universal Lumber & Mill Company. This company, in addition to its answer, filed a cross-complaint seeking to establish its claim of lien for lumber and materials furnished and used in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Le Mesnager v. VarielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Weldon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Frink v. Heirs of HedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Keech v. BeattyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Calhoun v. Huntington Park First Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Rogers v. WhitsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Lieberman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Mills v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API