Legal Opinion
Venetsanos v. Zucker, Facher & Zucker
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 4, 1994PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
271 N.J. Super. 459 (1994)
638 A.2d 1333
EMILY VENETSANOS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ASSIGNEE OF THE RIGHTS OF MANUEL DOMINGUEZ, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ZUCKER, FACHER & ZUCKER, AND ROGER C. WILSON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND HOMESTEAD INSURANCE CO. AND WALTER KOLODY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 1, 1993.
Decided March 4, 1994.
Before Judges SHEBELL, LONG and LANDAU.
Robert E. Mensel argued the cause for appellants (Hanlon, Lavigne, Herzfeld & Rubin, attorneys; Mr. Mensel of counsel and on the brief).
E. Carter Corriston argued the cause for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Homan v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Estate of Louis Penn v. Amalgam. Gen. Agen.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Reid v. RuffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Wilcox v. Anchor-Wate Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
- Catholic Mutual Relief Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Koken v. Legion InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Koken v. One Beacon InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.