Legal Opinion

Hall v. Luick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1983No. 249PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is a child custody case. The trial court granted custody of the parties’ son, now twelve years old, to the father. The mother has appealed. We reverse and remand for the reasons herein stated.

The standard of review which we must apply has been set forth in the following manner:

“It is settled that the paramount concern in a child custody proceeding is to determine what is in the best interests of the child. Commonwealth ex rel. Parikh v. Parikh, 449 Pa. 105, 296 A.2d 625 (1972); Sipe v. Shaffer, 263 Pa.Super. 27, 396 A.2d 1359 (1979). In a contest between parents, each…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re Custody of HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Gunter v. GunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Grillo v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Parikh v. ParikhSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. English v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. M.O. v. F.W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. CleggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Mo v. FwSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API