Legal Opinion

M.O. v. F.W.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

M.O. (Father) appeals from the trial court’s order granting Appellee, F.W. (Mother), sole legal custody and primary physical custody1 of the parties’ four-year-*1070old daughter, O.O. (Child). Father was granted two-hours (5:00 p.m.-7:00 p.m.) of supervised visitation with Child twice a week. After careful review, we affirm.

Child was born on June 13, 2007; Mother and Father never married. Custody-litigation between the parties started even before Child was born. In September 2008, the parties entered into a private custody evaluation with Dr. Steven Cohen; the evaluation was completed in…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McMillen v. McMillenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. In re F.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Cyran v. CyranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Hall v. LuickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tecce, T. v. Hally, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. J.R. Cellucci and E.H. Cellucci, his wife v. Laurel HOACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Mo v. FwSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API