Michultka v. Grapin
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cercone, J.,
The appellant, Mr. Michultka, brings this appeal dissatisfied with the amount of the damages verdict awarded by the jury. Although appellant challenges the propriety of two portions of appellee’s summation to the jury, we find no error not adequately cured by the trial court’s instructions and admonitions to the jury. Therefore, we find it necessary to discuss only one of appellant’s alie- gations of error herein, which arises from the trial court’s refusal to adopt one of appellant’s proffered points for charge.
At the trial of this trespass action arising from an April…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Evans v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Piwoz v. IannaconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Burke v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Pfordt v. Educators Beneficial Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Bogdanoff, to Use v. ManisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Universal Premium Acceptance Corporation v. The York Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Gorfti v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Denig, F. v. 501 Grandview, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Long v. Vincent, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1995
- Univ Premium v. York BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995