Legal Opinion

Bogdanoff, to Use v. Manis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1943No. Appeal, 179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

This is a proceeding in attachment execution on a judgment of $6,010.20 entered by plaintiff against Jules Manis and Dorothy E. Manis, his wife. Defendants had sold a drug store to Fred S. Russakoff and Mearl Katz and as part of the consideration received promissory notes of the purchasers totaling $5,500. When the writ of attachment issued, on September 17, 1941, twenty of the notes, each of $150 and payable one month apart, had not matured, * and Russakoff and Katz, summoned as garnishees, admitted this remaining indebtedness and their willingness to make…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Readshaw Et Ux. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Burke v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Marach v. KooistraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Pfordt v. Educators Beneficial Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Frew v. BartoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Piwoz v. IannaconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Argo v. GoodsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Matthews v. DerencinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spielvogel v. SpielvogelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. StaatsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API