Bogdanoff, to Use v. Manis
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Horace Stern,
This is a proceeding in attachment execution on a judgment of $6,010.20 entered by plaintiff against Jules Manis and Dorothy E. Manis, his wife. Defendants had sold a drug store to Fred S. Russakoff and Mearl Katz and as part of the consideration received promissory notes of the purchasers totaling $5,500. When the writ of attachment issued, on September 17, 1941, twenty of the notes, each of $150 and payable one month apart, had not matured, * and Russakoff and Katz, summoned as garnishees, admitted this remaining indebtedness and their willingness to make…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Readshaw Et Ux. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Burke v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Marach v. KooistraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Pfordt v. Educators Beneficial Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Frew v. BartoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Piwoz v. IannaconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Argo v. GoodsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Matthews v. DerencinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Spielvogel v. SpielvogelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. StaatsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.