Legal Opinion

Piwoz v. Iannacone

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1962No. Appeals, 297, 298, 299 and 300PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Eagen,

The plaintiff, Norman Piwoz, was operating an automobile owned by his parents, the plaintiffs, Dr. Seymour Piwoz and Ida Piwoz, which was involved in a collision with an automobile owned by the defendant, Emilio Iannacone, and operated by the defendant, Arnold Scott. An action for personal injuries and property damage resulted. A verdict in favor of all plaintiffs and against both defendants was returned by the jury. Motions for a new trial and judgment non obstante veredicto were refused by the court en banc. From the judgments entered upon the verdict, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brown v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Greco v. 7-Up Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Rogan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Hall v. VanderpoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Matkevich v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Eli L. Medunic and Dolores M. Medunic v. Louis W. LedererCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Martin v. SoblotneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Girard Trust Corn Exchange Bank v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API