Papile v. Robinson
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.
This action, founded on fraud, was tried to the court; judgment was rendered for the defendants, and the plaintiffs have appealed. The facts found, which are not subject to any correction which would benefit the plaintiffs, are as follows: On April 15, 1963, the parties entered into a written agreement for the purchase by the plaintiffs of the defendants’ house and land in Wolcott, at a price of $13,600. On April 25, 1963, the property was conveyed by warranty deed. On April 7, prior to the purchase agreement, the named plaintiff, over the telephone, asked the named defendant’s wife…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gustafson v. RustemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Basak v. DamutzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Egan v. Hudson Nut Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Helming v. KashakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Gayne v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hommerding v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Sisisky v. Enfield Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1968