Legal Opinion
Egan v. Hudson Nut Products, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 10, 1955PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivan, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action to recover the cost of correcting certain alleged structural defects in a house which they bought from the defendant. The court rendered judgment for the latter and the plaintiffs have appealed.
The finding is not subject to correction. It recites the following facts: The plaintiffs are husband and wife. The defendant is a corporation which was engaged, during the times herein mentioned, in developing a tract of land in the town of Westport. Prior to 1950, the defendant built on the tract twenty dwelling houses, one of which was bought by the plaintiffs on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boardman v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Watertown Savings Bank v. MattoonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Ceferatti v. BoisvertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Gayne v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Behrmann v. BehrmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Duksa v. City of MiddletownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Wedig v. BrinsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Franchey v. HannesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Bailey Employment System, Inc. v. HahnDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1982
- Jackson v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.