Legal Opinion
Umc Industries, Inc. v. Seaborg
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 24, 1971No. 24125PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
We adopt the following portions of the district court’s opinion.
“On June 28, 1960, plaintiff, UMC, and the Atomic Energy Commission (hereinafter called Commission) executed a contract whereby the Commission agreed to furnish $50,000 to UMC for research on an invention relating to the treatment of municipal and industrial wastes with nuclear radiation. Plaintiff, Spragg, a research chemist employed by UMC, conducted the research program called for in the contract.
In June, 1964, plaintiffs filed a patent application covering the invention that is the basis for the present dispute. Under 42…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Whitney National Bank in Jefferson Parish v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gardner v. AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Tibbetts Industries, Inc. And George C. Tibbetts v. Knowles Electronics, Inc. And Hugh S. KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
3Cited by15 opinions
- Investment Company Institute v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Getty Oil Co. v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- The Anaconda Company, a Montana Corporation v. William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Public Utility Commissioner Of Oregon v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- First Nat. Bank of Scotia v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.