Legal Opinion

Burnam v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 31, 1941PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Sims, Commissioner

Affirming.

Appellant, Eugene Burnam, a negro, appeals from the judgment of the Fayette Circuit Court wherein he was convicted of the crime of rape and his punishment fixed at death. A former conviction carrying the same penalty was reversed because of prejudicial remarks made by the trial judge to the jury relative to the length of time he might hold them on the consideration of the case. See Burnam v. Com., 283 Ky. 361, 141 S. W. (2d) 282.

Upon this appeal Burnam relies upon four alleged errors for reversal: 1. The court did not instruct on the whole…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Smith v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Merriss v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Lett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Glenday v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Owings v. Webb's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  3. Anderson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Karl v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
  5. Burkhart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API