Karl v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY,. Judge.
The appellant, Russell Stephen Karl, was convicted of the crime of armed assault with intent to rob. KRS 433.150. He appeals from a judgment sentencing him to serve twenty-one years in the state penitentiary. It is contended that the trial court erred: (1) in ruling a written confession admissible in evidence; (2) in refusing to permit appellant to introduce evidence concerning the circumstances surrounding the mailing of the confession after admitting the confession in evidence; and (3) in admitting incompetent testimony.
On February 12, 1955, a liquor store in Lexington,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. CrankUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Powell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Tarrence v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
- Bennett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
- Hamilton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Barnett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957