Legal Opinion

Karl v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 23, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY,. Judge.

The appellant, Russell Stephen Karl, was convicted of the crime of armed assault with intent to rob. KRS 433.150. He appeals from a judgment sentencing him to serve twenty-one years in the state penitentiary. It is contended that the trial court erred: (1) in ruling a written confession admissible in evidence; (2) in refusing to permit appellant to introduce evidence concerning the circumstances surrounding the mailing of the confession after admitting the confession in evidence; and (3) in admitting incompetent testimony.

On February 12, 1955, a liquor store in Lexington,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. CrankUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
  3. Powell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  4. Tarrence v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  5. Bennett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  2. Hamilton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  3. Barnett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  4. Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API