Pollock v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION DAVID POLLOCK, Plaintiff, No. 3:23-cv-00191-MO v. AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendants. IMMERGUT, J., After the Court issued its Opinion and Order granting Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment [ECF 39], Plaintiff filed an Unopposed Motion for Reconsideration [ECF 40]. Plaintiff argues that the Court legally erred because it found that Defendant only had a duty to defend under Plaintiff’s umbrella policy and not also under Plaintiff’s homeowner policy. Plaintiff alleges that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Godofredo Hernandez v. Spacelabs Medical Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ledford v. GutoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.