Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 5, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00191Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION DAVID POLLOCK, Plaintiff, No. 3:23-cv-00191-MO v. AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendants. IMMERGUT, J., After the Court issued its Opinion and Order granting Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment [ECF 39], Plaintiff filed an Unopposed Motion for Reconsideration [ECF 40]. Plaintiff argues that the Court legally erred because it found that Defendant only had a duty to defend under Plaintiff’s umbrella policy and not also under Plaintiff’s homeowner policy. Plaintiff alleges that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Godofredo Hernandez v. Spacelabs Medical Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Ledford v. GutoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API