Legal Opinion

McKey v. Egeland

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The plaintiff is a nonresident of the state, and the defendants procured an ex parte order directing the plaintiff to file security for costs within twenty days. The plaintiff did not file the bond within the time prescribed by the order. The defendants thereupon procured an ex parte judgment dismissing the action for failure to comply with the order. The court thereafter on motion of the plaintiff vacated the order of dismissal, permitted the filing of the security and reinstated the action for further proceedings. From the latter order the defendants appeal.

The order is not appealable. No…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. HoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hanson v. CusterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Felton v. HopkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Willing v. PorterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Buckley v. Park Building Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Fronhaefer v. RichterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bergen v. SchrodiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Cross v. LeuenbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API