Legal Opinion

In Re Workers'comp. Benfits of Noonkester

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 2006No. 04-746PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

140 P.3d 466 (2006)

2006 MT 169

332 Mont. 528

Montana State Fund, Petitioner,

In re: THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS OF Tucker NOONKESTER

Tucker Noonkester, Petitioner and Respondent,

v.

Montana State Fund, Respondent/Insurer for

C & S Construction, Inc., Employer and Appellant.

No. 04-746.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted on Briefs: August 10, 2005.

Decided: July 25, 2006.

Michael P. Heringer and Jeffrey McAllister, Brown Law Firm, P.C., Billings, for Appellant.

James E. Edmiston, Edmiston, Schermerhorn & Colton, Billings, David R. Paoli, Paoli & Shea, P.C. Missoula, Thomas E. Martello, Montana…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. TweedyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Stavenjord v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. EvertMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ruhd v. Liberty Northwest Insurance CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Pinnow v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Pinnow v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Thompson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API