In Re Workers'comp. Benfits of Noonkester
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
140 P.3d 466 (2006)
2006 MT 169
332 Mont. 528
Montana State Fund, Petitioner,
In re: THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS OF Tucker NOONKESTER
Tucker Noonkester, Petitioner and Respondent,
v.
Montana State Fund, Respondent/Insurer for
C & S Construction, Inc., Employer and Appellant.
No. 04-746.
Supreme Court of Montana.
Submitted on Briefs: August 10, 2005.
Decided: July 25, 2006.
Michael P. Heringer and Jeffrey McAllister, Brown Law Firm, P.C., Billings, for Appellant.
James E. Edmiston, Edmiston, Schermerhorn & Colton, Billings, David R. Paoli, Paoli & Shea, P.C. Missoula, Thomas E. Martello, Montana…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. FergusonMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. TweedyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Stavenjord v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. EvertMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Ruhd v. Liberty Northwest Insurance CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thompson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Pinnow v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Pinnow v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- Thompson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2007