Legal Opinion
Beatty v. USAA Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 31, 1997No. 97-349PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W.H. “Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.
This case involves an interpretation of the term insurable interest found in Ark. Code Ann. § 23-79-104(b) (Repl. 1992). Appellants claim that they have an insurable interest in an automobile and are entitled to the policy proceeds of an insurance contract covering property damage to the automobile. The trial court granted summary judgment for the insurer based upon the finding that appellants did not have an insurable interest. Appellants claim error in this ruling; we agree and reverse and remand.
On June 24, 1993, Douglas Beatty had a Toyota Célica delivered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Page v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Shipp v. DavisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Pyle v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Irvin v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Smothers v. ClouetteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. One Lincoln Navigator 1998, Freddie Bearden Wanda Breedlove Andrews, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- O'FALLON v. O'Fallon Ex Rel. NgarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Farr v. American National Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- In re JamesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.