Legal Opinion

Brannon v. Rinzler

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1991No. Nos. 12219, 12310PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

The appellants, Dwight D. Brannon, Lytton F. Crossley, and S. Richard Reece, appeal the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment to the group of appellees known as Winsted Operations, Dorset Marine Operations, MS Barge, Hugh Levey, Stuart Becker, and Mystic Marine Towing Partners (“MMTP”) (hereinafter collectively “Winsted”); and the group of appellees known as Rinzler, Rinzler & Associates, Inc. and MT Associates (“MTA”) (hereinafter collectively “Rinzler”), and denying summary judgment to appellants. The trial court’s memorandum decision stated that MTA is a general…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Securities v. Hawaii Market Center, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. GeorgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Ohio, Dept. of Public Welfare v. LicsakOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Hidalgo v. General Fire & Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Kiel v. Circuit Design Technology, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wall v. Firelands Radiology, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Carlton v. DavissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Hoffman v. Gallia Cnty. Sheriff's OfficeOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Hackathorn v. PreisseOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Shumway v. State Teachers Retirement BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API