Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Celotex Corp.

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided September 8, 1983No. Civ. A3-81-2PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BENSON, Chief Judge.

This diversity action involves claims under theories of strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty against alleged manufacturers, miners, processors, importers, converters, compounders, and/or retailers of asbestos products. Marjorie Mat thews, as surviving spouse, personal representative, and on behalf of surviving children of her deceased insulation worker husband Alex D. Matthews, is seeking damages for alleged wrongful death and surviving claims of her husband.

Following discovery, all defendants except Unarco Industries, Inc. and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Blannie S. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. Connelly v. Paul Ruddy's Equipment Repair & Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Giordano v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Potts v. Celotex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Gentry v. WallaceMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mummert v. AlizadehCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API