Legal Opinion

Townsend & Bottum, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1980No. Appeal, No. 1562 C.D. 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Townsend & Bottum, Inc., and its insurer Michigan Mutual Insurance Company (petitioners) appeal from the decision and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (board) remanding the claim of Clifford C. Way (claimant) to the referee for determination of the extent of claimant’s disability, if any.

Although claimant has not filed an application to quash the appeal, all parties argue the issue of the reviewability of the interlocutory remand order,- hence we will treat the case as if such an application were before us. See Rockwood Area School District v. Workmen’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riley Stoker Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. United Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. ZindashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Flynn v. Asten Hill Manufacturing Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. American Can Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Gilroy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API