Legal Opinion

Harry Ferguson, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 5, 1956No. 120-52PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittletoN, Judge

This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff seeks to recover interest alleged to have been erroneously collected for 1940,1941, and 1942.

Plaintiff is a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business at Detroit, Michigan. It was incorporated on May 16, 1939, under the name Ferguson-Sherman Manufacturing Corporation, but subsequently changed its name to Harry Ferguson, Inc., on April 15, 1942. Plaintiff began actual business operations on August 1,1939.

Plaintiff filed its corporation income…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Koppers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. Premier Oil Refining Co. Of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  3. Seeley Tube & Box Co. v. ManningDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1948
  4. Premium Oil Refining Co. of Texas v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1952
  5. Consolidated Electronics Industries Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Continental Foundry & MacHine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  3. Continental Foundry & Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Computervision Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Tompkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API