Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tompkins v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 16, 1972No. 315-66Published

1DissentNichols, Judge

I fully agree with, tlie court and our Commissioner Gamer that the interest the trust paid with respect to a deficiency in federal estate tax was not attributable to a trade or business the trust carried on, and as a result, no net operating loss carryback is available with respect to such interest. Eespeot-fully, I differ as to the other stated issue. I think in the circumstances here involved, a claim for refund based according to its terms solely on a net operating loss carryback may be adequate notice of a claim based on a Section 163 interest deduction, when the item involved is the same…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. KalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. United States v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API