Legal Opinion

Seeley Tube & Box Co. v. Manning

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 3, 1948No. Civ. No. 6597PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, District Judge.

This is a civil action for the recovery of $4,513.34, representing interest on certain deficiency taxes for the fiscal period beginning January 1, 1941 and ending September 30, 1941, which the plaintiff alleges were erroneously assessed and collected. The action is submitted to the Court on a stipulation of facts which we adopt as our findings of fact. It is necessary to repeat herein only the ultimate facts essential to the determination of the only question presented, which the parties concede is one of novel impression.

Facts

I. The plaintiff filed with the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ChildsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Penrose v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Owens v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Manning v. Seeley Tube & Box Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Estate of Bahr v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
  3. Harry Ferguson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  4. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
  5. Hastings & Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API