Legal Opinion

Daeschler v. Daeschler

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 31, 1986PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

214 N.J. Super. 545 (1986)

520 A.2d 777

RENETTA H. DAESCHLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ALBERT DAESCHLER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT,

v.

JOHN BRUNO CORPORATION, INTERVENOR-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 7, 1986.

Decided December 31, 1986.

Before Judges PRESSLER, GAULKIN and BAIME.

Richard B. Honig argued the cause for appellant (Klinger, Nicolette, Mavroudis & Honig, attorneys; Richard Honig, of counsel; John A. Rizzo, on the brief).

Ralph A. Ferro argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Ferro and Ferro, attorneys).

Michael L. Ostrowsky argued the cause for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  3. Painter v. PainterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Newman v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. King v. GreeneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Freda v. Commercial Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. Kohn v. Hursa (In Re Hursa)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
  3. Vander Weert v. Vander WeertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Clementi v. ClementiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
  5. Carr v. BurgessNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API