Legal Opinion

Lenox Clothes Shops v. Com'r of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1943No. 9353PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

The corporate petitioner operates a retail clothing store at Detroit, Michigan. A portion of its sales are for cash and a portion on the installment plan, or conditional sales contracts. Petitioner, in its income tax return for the calendar year 1936, in answer to a question on the tax form, •stated that it valued its inventories at cost. For the calendar year ending December 31, 1937, petitioner, in making its income tax return, reduced its closing inventory $6,-741.31 below cost, which was a flat reduction of fifteen percent. On December 31, 1937, petitioner credited…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Burnet v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. General Utilities & Operating Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Lucas v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tulia Feedlot, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Ethel A. Doll v. Seldon R. GlennCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Erie Forge Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. Ferdinand Cinelli and Sarah M. Cinelli v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API