Legal Opinion

State v. Garnier

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2000No. 98-CR-1014; CA A106302PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

The state appeals from an order dismissing charges against defendant of fourth-degree assault, ORS 163.160, and recklessly endangering another person, ORS 163.195. Defendant moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that statutory former jeopardy provisions barred the prosecution, because he previously had been cited for maintaining a dog as a nuisance in violation of ORS 609.095, based on the same events. The trial court granted defendant’s motion. On appeal, we reverse.

On December 19,1997, defendant was issued a citation for maintaining a dog as a nuisance. The citation specified that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DarlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. StolzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. TosteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. State v. TosteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API