Legal Opinion

Stallings v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1990No. 56276PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial after an evi-dentiary hearing of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury of burglary in the second degree. Movant was found to be a class X offender. Prior to sentencing, post-trial plea negotiations took place. The prosecutor recommended a ten-year sentence. The court accepted the State’s recommendation. At the sentencing, movant testified he did not want to appeal his conviction.

On July 27, 1988, movant filed his Rule 29.15 motion alleging a Batson challenge to his jury panel and ineffective assistance of counsel. On December…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCrary v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Shaw v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Thompson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RedmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Henderson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Moore v. SachseDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2006
  4. State v. JacobsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Monigan v. NormanDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API