Legal Opinion
Bliven v. Hunt
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 12, 2005No. 05-CV-4852 SJF/LBPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEUERSTEIN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff, an attorney admitted to practice in the state of New York, files the instant action pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, asserting claims arising out of his alleged reduction in pay as a public defender within the Law Guardian Program, Appellate Division, Second Department and the Assigned Counsel Panel for the City of New York. Plaintiff paid the statutory filing fee to commence this action. As set forth below, Counts Two through Eight, which assert monetary claims against immune individuals, are dismissed as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bliven v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- McKnight v. MiddletonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Bobrowsky v. Yonkers CourthouseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Bliven v. HuntDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Deaton v. NapoliDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019