Legal Opinion
Soo Line Railroad v. Tang Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 13, 1998No. 97 C 0670PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEINENWEBER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Soo Line Railroad Company (“Soo Line”) sues three entities who previously leased a portion of its railroad yard, Tang Industries, Inc. (“Tang”), Cometco Corporation (“Cometco”) and Cozzi Iron & Metal, Inc. (“Cozzi”), for contribution and response costs recovery under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1990 (“CERCLA”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. (1990) and violations of state law. Defendant Tang moves to dismiss all portions of plaintiffs complaint concerning its liability.
BACKGR…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michael C. Antonelli v. Michael F. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Venture Associates Corporation, a Tennessee Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- LAJIM, LLC v. Gen. Elec. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Dico, Inc. v. Amoco Oil Company, Chevron Chemical Company Monsanto Company Shell Oil Company Bayer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. Amoco Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- CITY OF GARY, INDIANA v. ShaferDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
- Neumann v. Carlson Environmental, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.