Anderson v. Gill
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception. — The' case being tried by the Court, by agreement of counsel, without the aid of a jury, the plaintiff prayed the Court “ to find as matter of law that under the agreed statement of facts the plaintiff is entitled to a verdict for the amount of the check mentioned in the declaration and interest thereon from January 15th, 1892.” The defendant offered the two following prayers:…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception. — The' case being tried by the Court, by agreement of counsel, without the aid of a jury, the plaintiff prayed the Court “ to find as matter of law that under the agreed statement of facts the plaintiff is entitled to a verdict for the amount of the check mentioned in the declaration and interest thereon from January 15th, 1892.” The defendant offered the two following prayers: 1. That the Court declare as matter of law that under the pleadings and agreed statement of facts in this case the…
1Opinion of the CourtMcSheeev, J.
On the thirteenth of January, 1892, Anderson, the appellant, drew his check in favor of Mary A. Dodge on J. J. Nicholson & Sons, bankers in the city of Baltimore,, for $692.03 and delivered it to the payee the same day. She forthwith deposited it to her credit in her account with the Old Town Bank of the same city, duly endorsed for collection. On the following day, the fourteenth, the Old Town Bank sent the check by its runner to the banking house of Nicholson & Sons where it was presented for payment shortly before eleven o’clock a. m., during the usual hours of business. Anderson had to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Ward v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Dodge v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Smith v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- First Nat. Bank of Jersey City v. . LeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Joseph Mogul, Inc. v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Comer v. DufourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Cleve v. Craven Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Noble v. DoughtenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.