Legal Opinion
DeCastecker v. Case Corp.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided October 3, 1995No. 94-4089PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McDADE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Case Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgement [Doc #34], Defendant Case Corporation (“Case”) is a corporation which operates manufacturing facilities in the Quad City area. Plaintiff Allan DeCastecker (“DeCas-tecker”) applied for and was denied a position with Defendant. As a result, Plaintiff filed a suit based upon the Age Discrimina tion and Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The Court has jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to the ADEA.
BACKGROUND
The following facts gave rise to the present controversy and are not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coleman v. Keebler Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Matthews v. Commonwealth Edison Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996